Serien schauen ohne Ende: Der Einfluss von Cliffhangern auf das Unterhaltungserleben und die weitere Nutzung von TV-Serien. Poster auf der DGPuK Jahrestagung 2020 in München.

  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
  • Cyders, M. A., Littlefield, A. K., Coffey, S., & Karyadi, K. A. (2014). Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Addictive Behaviors, 39(9), 1372–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.02.013
  • Exelmans, L., & Bulck, J. V. den. (2017). Binge Viewing, Sleep, and the Role of Pre-Sleep Arousal. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 13(08), 1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.6704
  • Fröhlich, V. (2015). Der Cliffhanger und die serielle Narration: Analyse einer transmedialen Erzähltechnik. transcript Verlag.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
  • Jurga, M. (1998). Der Cliffhanger. In H. Willems & M. Jurga (Eds.), Inszenierungsgesellschaft: Ein einführendes Handbuch (pp. 471–488). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89797-8_26
  • De Holanda Coelho, L.G., Hanel, P. H. P., & Wolf, L. J. (2018). The Very Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition: Developing a Six-Item Version. Assessment, 1073191118793208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118793208
  • Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004
  • Schlütz, D. M. (2016). Contemporary Quality TV: The Entertainment Experience of Complex Serial Narratives. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735257
  • Shim, H., & Kim, K. J. (2018). An exploration of the motivations for Binge-Watching and the role of individual differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.032
  • Slater, D. M., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Message Variability and Heterogeneity: A Core Challenge for Communication Research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 39(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11679170
  • Sung, Y. H., Kang, E. Y., & Lee, W.-N. (2018). Why Do We Indulge? Exploring Motivations for Binge Watching. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(3), 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2018.1451851
  • Tukachinsky, R., & Eyal, K. (2018). The Psychology of Marathon Television Viewing: Antecedents and Viewer Involvement. Mass Communication and Society, 21(3), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1422765
  • Walton-Pattison, E., Dombrowski, S. U., & Presseau, J. (2018). ‘Just one more episode’: Frequency and theoretical correlates of television binge watching. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316643379
  • Weber, T., & Junklewitz, C. (2010). To Be Continued …: Funktion und Gestaltungsmittel des Cliffhangers in aktuellen Fernsehserien. Previously on…, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846748350_008
%d Bloggern gefällt das: